Life Lessons from Chess and Go Board Games | Go Game Lessons | Chess Strategies

Discover valuable life lessons from the strategic worlds of chess and Go. Learn how these timeless board games teach important strategies and insights that can be applied to everyday life. Go game lessons. Chess strategies.

MONTHLY STATEMENTS

Tonny Rutakirwa

9/1/20154 min read

The greatest form of poverty is to use everything in one generation. I hinted on this while speaking during Thanksgiving at my local church on Sunday 1st Feb, bringing forth deeper reflections about the essence of wisdom and understanding. It is essential to remind ourselves why it is that winners focus intently on their pursuits, while losers seem occupied with the victories of others! This dichotomy in mindset resonates deeply with me, particularly when reflecting on Chinese history, which offers profound insights. I refer specifically to a powerful principle articulated on Page 423 from The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene, which underscores the importance of strategic advantage and is what we were compelled to share today, illuminating how knowledge shapes our actions and decisions.

“The two board games that best approximate the strategies of war are chess and the Asian game of 'go'. In chess, the board is small, limiting the potential for creativity and expansive thought. In comparison to go, the attack comes relatively quickly, forcing a decisive battle. It rarely pays to withdraw or sacrifice your pieces, which must be concentrated in key areas that can sway the outcome of the game. Go, on the other hand, is much less formal and has an entirely different rhythm. It is played on a large grid, with 361 intersections—nearly six times as many positions as in chess. The black and white stones—one color for each side—are placed on the board intersections, one at a time wherever your strategy dictates. Once all your stones (52 for each side) are on the board, your objective is to isolate the stones of your opponent by encircling them, presenting a fascinating challenge that requires foresight and strategic depth.

A game of go—called 'wei-chi' in China—can last up to three hundred moves, considered an endurance test of mental and spatial prowess. The strategy is inherently more subtle and fluid than chess, developing slowly and requiring patience; the more complex the pattern your stones initially create on the board, the harder it is for your opponent to decipher your long-term strategy. Fighting to control a particular area is not worth the trouble; instead, you must think in larger terms, being prepared to sacrifice an area in order to eventually dominate the entire board. What you are after is not simply an entrenched position but the ability to maintain mobility. With mobility, you can isolate your opponent in small areas and then encircle them with tactical finesse. The aim is not to kill off the opponent's pieces directly, as in chess, but rather to induce a kind of paralysis and collapse in their defensive strategy. While chess presents a linear, position-oriented, and aggressive approach, go is characterized by its non-linear fluidity. In go, aggression is indirect until the end of the game, when the winner can surround the opponent's stones with an accelerated strategy.

Chinese military strategists have drawn inspiration from the game of go for centuries. Its proverbs have been applied to war time and again, revealing the depth of strategic thought that spans generations; Mao Tse-tung was particularly captivated by wei-chi, and its precepts were deeply ingrained in his strategies. A pivotal wei-chi concept, for example, is to leverage the size of the board to your advantage, allowing you to spread out in every direction so that your opponent cannot easily fathom your movements in a simple linear way, thus creating a veil of uncertainty regarding your intentions.

“Every Chinese,” Mao once articulated, “should consciously throw himself into this war of a jigsaw pattern” against Nationalists. When you place your men in a jigsaw pattern in go, your opponent becomes disoriented, losing himself in the attempt to figure out what you are up to. Either he wastes valuable time pursuing you, or, akin to Chiang Kaishek, he falls into the trap of assuming you are incompetent, thereby neglecting to protect himself effectively. And if he concentrates solely on single areas, as Western strategy often advises, he risks becoming a sitting duck for entitlement. In the wei-chi way of warfare, the strategy is to encircle the enemy's mind, employing mind games, propaganda, and irritation tactics to confuse and dishearten them. This was emblematic of the strategy employed by the Communists—an apparent formlessness that disoriented and instilled fear in the enemy forces.

Where chess is linear and direct, the ancient game of go is much closer to the type of strategy that will prove relevant in a world where battles are increasingly fought indirectly, in vast, loosely connected arenas. Its strategies are abstract and multi-dimensional, existing in a realm that transcends time and space: the strategist's mind. In this fluid approach to warfare, value is placed on movement over mere position. Your speed and mobility can make it nearly impossible for opponents to predict your next moves; unable to understand your intentions or strategies fully, your enemy can form no effective strategy to defeat you. Instead of fixating on particular spots, this indirect form of warfare appeals to spread out, mirroring how one can utilize the vast and disconnected nature of the real world to their advantage. Be like vapor; do not provide your opponents with any solid target to attack; observe as they exhaust themselves in the futile pursuit of your elusive existence. It is only through formlessness that you can truly catch your enemies by surprise—by the time they figure out where you are and what your intentions are, it is often too late.

Have a great month of September 2015! May it be filled with reflections and breakthroughs, leading toward great achievements and personal growth!

Tonny Rutakirwa,

Chairman,

Tonniez Group Holdings.